Fine grain programmable gate architecture with hybrid logic/routing element and direct-drive routing

ABSTRACT

An apparatus is disclosed herein for a programmable gate architecture with hybrid logic/routing circuitry. In one embodiment, a programmable gate array comprises a plurality of hybrid logic or routing tiles (HLRT), each of the HLRTs having a hybrid logic-or-routing function (HLR) that is configurable as a logic function or a routing function.

PRIORITY

The present patent application claims priority to and incorporates byreference the corresponding provisional patent application Ser. No.61/709,837, titled, “Fine Grain Programmable Gate Architecture withHybrid Logic/Routing Element and Direct-Drive Routing” filed on Oct. 4,2012.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the present invention relate to the field of programmablegate architectures; more particularly, embodiments of the presentinvention relate to programmable gate architectures with a programmableelement that allows the gate architecture to be configured as a logicfunction or a routing function.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Modern FPGA fabric architecture consists of programmable segmentedrouting and programmable logic blocks. Segmented routing usuallyconsists of routing wires in different lengths in vertical andhorizontal directions. For example, the x1 length can reach the nexttile and the x2 length can reach 2 tiles away. Shorter routing usuallyprovides more routing flexibility and lower metal channel usage, butshorter routing can cause performance to be slower. The use of longerrouting is faster for longer distance connections, but more costly interms of die size and less flexibility in terms of connectivity.Overall, FPGA programmable routing is costly in die size, slow inperformance, and more power hungry than other ASIC and ASSP solutions inthe same process technology.

FIG. 1 represents a typical FPGA architecture model upon which mostmodern FPGAs are based. Referring to FIG. 1, the connection block (“C”Block) provides input and output multiplexing (muxing) connections fromthe corresponding logic block to vertical and horizontal routings. Theswitch block (“S” Block) provides the vertical and horizontal routingconnections to stitch routing segments together. Routing resources havevarious segmentation lengths to provide different tradeoffs betweenrouting density, connection flexibility, performance, etc.

Generally, since an FPGA has the same routing density across the entirearray, routing count per row or column is set by the worst-case routingcongestion. This is quite wasteful given that most locations wouldrequire routing density much lower than the worst-case locations.

Another challenge with modern FPGAs is that the advanced processtechnology node has very resistive metal interconnects even though thetransistors contained therein are getting faster. This affects theoverall FPGA performance significantly, given that routing delay limitsFPGA performance and resistive metal interconnect slows down longerrouting significantly. In order to compensate of this effect, modernFPGAs use wider metal wires to lower resistance for performance, whichin turn consumes even more area and power.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An apparatus is disclosed herein for a programmable gate architecturewith hybrid logic/routing circuitry. In one embodiment, a programmablegate array comprises a plurality of hybrid logic or routing tiles(HLRT), each of the HLRTs having a hybrid logic-or-routing function(HLR) that is configurable as a logic function or a routing function.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The present invention will be understood more fully from the detaileddescription given below and from the accompanying drawings of variousembodiments of the invention, which, however, should not be taken tolimit the invention to the specific embodiments, but are for explanationand understanding only.

FIG. 1 illustrates a typical FPGA architecture model upon which mostmodern FPGAs are based.

FIGS. 2A-C illustrate one embodiment of a programmable logicarchitecture in which each new logic tile (HLRT) can be configured as alogic function or a routing function to enable the hybridlogic-or-routing function (HLR) to serve as a routing hop.

FIG. 3A illustrates example of direct routing with respect to HLRTs.

FIG. 3B illustrates an HLRT array with different types of logicelements.

FIGS. 4A-D illustrates a place-and-route example of one design in threedifferent HLRT arrays.

FIG. 5 illustrates an example integrated circuit integration of an HLRTarray in a stacked dies arrangement.

FIG. 6 illustrates another example integrated circuit integration of anHLRT array onto a 2.5D silicon interposer arrangement.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example monolithic integrated circuit integrationof an HLRT array as part of a processor in monolithic IC integration.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PRESENT INVENTION

Embodiments of this invention include a programmable gate architecturethat includes a fine-grain logic-or-routing programmable element with adirect-drive routing architecture. In one embodiment, a direct-driverouting architecture is a routing architecture where each routingresource can only be driven by one source, different from existing FPGArouting architectures where each routing resource can be driven by tensof sources with a large input multiplexing. In one embodiment, theprogrammable element utilizes direct-drive routing channels to connectblocks together directly, without hopping through routing segmentationin a typical segmented routing architecture as is used in most FPGAarchitectures. If one direct routing cannot reach from the source blockto destination block, another block(s) can be configured to operate as arouting function to extend the reach to complete the connection.

Embodiments of this invention provide a significant speed advantageagainst the segmented routing architecture of the prior art because ofthe use of direct-drive routing. The direct-drive routing also cheaper(less die size) and more power efficient than the traditional FPGAsbecause the routing resources can be dynamically expanded to handle theworst case routing congestion without wasting extra routing resourceseverywhere else.

In the following description, numerous details are set forth to providea more thorough explanation of the present invention. It will beapparent, however, to one skilled in the art, that the present inventionmay be practiced without these specific details. In other instances,well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form,rather than in detail, in order to avoid obscuring the presentinvention.

Some portions of the detailed descriptions which follow are presented interms of algorithms and symbolic representations of operations on databits within a computer memory. These algorithmic descriptions andrepresentations are the means used by those skilled in the dataprocessing arts to most effectively convey the substance of their workto others skilled in the art. An algorithm is here, and generally,conceived to be a self-consistent sequence of steps leading to a desiredresult. The steps are those requiring physical manipulations of physicalquantities. Usually, though not necessarily, these quantities take theform of electrical or magnetic signals capable of being stored,transferred, combined, compared, and otherwise manipulated. It hasproven convenient at times, principally for reasons of common usage, torefer to these signals as bits, values, elements, symbols, characters,terms, numbers, or the like.

It should be borne in mind, however, that all of these and similar termsare to be associated with the appropriate physical quantities and aremerely convenient labels applied to these quantities. Unlessspecifically stated otherwise as apparent from the following discussion,it is appreciated that throughout the description, discussions utilizingterms such as “processing” or “computing” or “calculating” or“determining” or “displaying” or the like, refer to the action andprocesses of a computer system, or similar electronic computing device,that manipulates and transforms data represented as physical(electronic) quantities within the computer system's registers andmemories into other data similarly represented as physical quantitieswithin the computer system memories or registers or other suchinformation storage, transmission or display devices.

The present invention also relates to apparatus for performing theoperations herein. This apparatus may be specially constructed for therequired purposes, or it may comprise a general purpose computerselectively activated or reconfigured by a computer program stored inthe computer. Such a computer program may be stored in a computerreadable storage medium, such as, but is not limited to, any type ofdisk including floppy disks, optical disks, CD-ROMs, andmagnetic-optical disks, read-only memories (ROMs), random accessmemories (RAMs), EPROMs, EEPROMs, magnetic or optical cards, or any typeof media suitable for storing electronic instructions, and each coupledto a computer system bus.

The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently relatedto any particular computer or other apparatus. Various general purposesystems may be used with programs in accordance with the teachingsherein, or it may prove convenient to construct more specializedapparatus to perform the required method steps. The required structurefor a variety of these systems will appear from the description below.In addition, the present invention is not described with reference toany particular programming language. It will be appreciated that avariety of programming languages may be used to implement the teachingsof the invention as described herein.

A machine-readable medium includes any mechanism for storing ortransmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., acomputer). For example, a machine-readable medium includes read onlymemory (“ROM”); random access memory (“RAM”); magnetic disk storagemedia; optical storage media; flash memory devices; etc.

Overview

A programmable gate architecture having multiple hybrid logic or routingtiles (HLRT) is disclosed. In one embodiment, the plurality of HLRTsforms an array of columns and rows. In one embodiment, each of the HLRTsis configurable as a logic function or a routing function. In oneembodiment, one or more of the HLRTs are configured as a routingfunction and serve as a routing hub. In one embodiment, where an HLRT isconfigured as a logic function, the logic function is implemented usinga look-up table structure programmed as a multiplexer.

In one embodiment, neighboring HLRTs are directly connected viadirect-drive routing. That is, HLRTs are connected together withoutrouting segmentation. In one embodiment, to connect an HLRT configuredas a logic function with an external port, multiple HLRTs that areconfigured as routing functions may be used, such that the external portis directly connected to the HLRT configured as the logic function andsignals can be transferred through the direct connection formed by themultiple HLRTs configured as routing functions.

In one embodiment, HLRTs in the plurality of HLRTs include a connectionblock to provide input multiplexing to an HLRT. In one embodiment, theconnection block provides input multiplexing without providing outputmultiplexing to routing resources.

In one embodiment, the HLRTs comprise a stand-alone die. In anotherembodiment, the HLRTs form an array that is an embedded IP core in anintegrated circuit. In yet another embodiment, the HLRTs form an arraythat is part of a stacked die arrangement.

FIG. 2A illustrates one embodiment of a programmable logic architecturein which each new hybrid logic-or-Routing function (HLR) can also serveas a routing hop or a logic function. That is, the HLR is configurableas a logic function or a routing function. Referring to FIG. 2, aprogrammable logic architecture 200 (HLRT) with a hybridlogic-or-routing function (HLR) 201 and connection blocks 202 and 203.HLR 201 is configurable as either a logic function or a routingfunction. FIG. 2C illustrates an HLR with selectable logic mode (e.g.,n-input look-up table) to support any n-inputs logic functions or thesame logic block can be configured as routing mux and driverconfigurations to support routing expansion by programming the look-uptable content accordingly.

For example, in one configuration, logic block in HLR 201 is implementedusing a look-up table structure for any logic function that has ninputs. The same look-up table structure can be programmed as a staticn-to-1 multiplexer (mux) such that HLR 201 can serve as a routing hop tojump between routing segments, similar to the function of a switchingblock as in the typical modern FPGA architecture in FIG. 1.

In one embodiment, all routing resources are direct connections betweentwo HLRTs such that no switching block is needed in this architecture(as is shown in the prior art of FIG. 1).

Connection blocks 202 and 203 only provide input multiplexing (muxing)to HLRs without output muxing to routing resources as occurs in atypical segmented routing architecture of the prior art. FIG. 2Billustrates the input muxing with a direct routing input and an outputbeing sent to a logic function or a routing function provided by theHLR. Although FIG. 2B only shows one mux, there may be more than oneinput mux in each connection block. Note that while two connectionblocks are shown in FIG. 2A, a programmable gate architecture may havemore or less than two connection blocks interfacing the HLR to therouting traces.

Embodiments of the programmable gate architecture described herein offera number of benefits. Embodiments of the programmable gate architectureprovide ultra fast logic-to-logic connection such that it is much fasterto implement critical paths than typical segmented FPGA. Since there isno fixed logic and routing resource allocation and such can bereassigned dynamically, embodiments of the programmable gatearchitecture don't require extra routing resources allocated everywherefor the worst-case designs. As the result, it has high logic density perarea and it is cheaper in die size than traditional segmentedarchitecture.

FIG. 3A shows a direct routing example where a HLRT output can reach anumber of surrounding HLRT inputs directly. Referring to FIG. 3A, asource block representing one programmable gate architecture with anHLRT can reach 16 surrounding HLRT inputs directly. The 16 HLRTs areshown with the letter “D”, representing destinations with directconnections from the source block. This direct routing approach can beextended to cover different numbers of surrounding HLRT neighbors. Alsoshown are blocks, labeled “NDC”, that have no direct connection from thesource block.

In one embodiment, the HLRT array may contain different types of logicelements and can support other functions as well, including memory, DSPand other embedded IP elements, as shown in FIG. 3B.

FIGS. 4A-D shows a post place-and-route example whether a sample designwith 5 logic blocks (labeled “A” to “E”) are connected to 7 externalports (1-7). Referring to FIG. 4A, a circuit design is shown with inputs1-6 and the 5 logic blocks A-E producing an output 7. When this designis placed into an HLRT array, such as shown in either of FIGS. 4B-D, 5tiles are used in logic mode for block A to E and the connectionsbetween these tiles are direct connections as shown in FIG. 3. These 5logic tiles are labeled as “A”, “B’, “C”, “D” and “E” in the 3 arrays ofFIGS. 4B-D. These 3 HLRT arrays are 4×4 (FIG. 4D), 6×6 (FIG. 4C) and19×19 (FIG. 4B) in size.

Assuming all ports are at the outside boundary of the arrays shown inFIGS. 4B-D, the 7 external ports (port 1 to 7) may connect to block A toE directly through the direct-routing pattern as in FIG. 3 or they willneed to hop through other HLRTs used as routing function blocks. Theyare labeled as “1” to “7” squares in the 3 HLRT arrays in FIGS. 4B-D.For example, as in the 19×19 array of FIG. 4B, the net to connect block“E” (the output of the circuit design of FIG. 4A) to port “7” goesthrough seven HLRT tiles. Thus, those 7 tiles are configured as routingfunctions and there is an initial hop from logic block E to the closesttile (square) with a “7”. Similarly, the input 1 that goes to logicblock A and block C of the circuit design in FIG. 4A would beimplemented by a hop from the external port 1 to the nearest tilelabeled with a 1 and then from that HLRT labeled 1 one a directconnection to logic block A and another hop to the other HLRT labeled 1from which a direct connection to logic block C is made. Similarconnections are made in FIG. 4B from the external ports 2-6 throughother HLRTs to the logic blocks to implement the circuit design in FIG.4A.

The implementation of the connections in the arrays of FIGS. 4C and 4Dare made in a similar way to those in FIG. 4B, except there are somedirect connections between external ports and HLRTs implementing logicblocks in FIGS. 4C and 4D. For example, in FIG. 4C, external port 1 isdirectly connected to logic blocks A and C, external port 2 is directlyconnected to logic block A, and external port 4 is directly connected tologic block B. In FIG. 4C, external port 3 connects to logic block Adirectly to logic block E using two hops.

FIGS. 5-7 illustrate example integrated circuit (IC) integrations withHLRT arrays. More specifically, FIG. 5 illustrates an example integratedcircuit integration of an HLRT array in a stacked dies arrangement.Referring to FIG. 5, FPGA 501 comprising an HLRT array (of HLRTs) isstacked on DRAM stack 502, which is stacked on top of applicationprocessor 503. Application processor 503 is attached to a packagesubstrate as in a typical 3D integration.

FIG. 6 illustrates another example integrated circuit integration of anHLRT array onto a silicon interposer on top of package substrate.Referring to FIG. 6, an FPGA tile 601 consisting of an HLRT array die isstacked on top a silicon interposer 604 with an ASIC/ASSP 602 and twoDRAM stacks 603 stacked on interposer 640. In one embodiment,connections between these components include through silicon vias(TSVs). Silicon interposer 604 is connected to a package substrate as ina typical 2.5D integration.

FIG. 7 illustrates an example monolithic integrated circuit integrationof an HLRT array are part of a processor. Referring to FIG. 7, an HLRTarray IP 701 consisting of multiple HLRTs is shown integrated into amonolithic IC. In one embodiment, the monolithic IC comprises ansystem-on-a-chip (SOC) and/or application processor.

Whereas many alterations and modifications of the present invention willno doubt become apparent to a person of ordinary skill in the art afterhaving read the foregoing description, it is to be understood that anyparticular embodiment shown and described by way of illustration is inno way intended to be considered limiting. Therefore, references todetails of various embodiments are not intended to limit the scope ofthe claims which in themselves recite only those features regarded asessential to the invention.

I claim:
 1. A field programmable gate array (FPGA) comprising: aplurality of hybrid logic or routing tiles (HLRT), each of the HLRTshaving a hybrid logic-or-routing function (HLR) that is configurable asa logic function or a routing function.
 2. The FPGA defined in claim 1wherein a predefined set of HLRTs in the plurality of HLRTs areneighboring HLRTs, and further wherein neighboring HLRTs are directlyconnected via direct-drive routing.
 3. The FPGA defined in claim 2wherein the direct-drive routing connects HLRTs together without routingsegmentation.
 4. The FPGA defined in claim 1 wherein one or more of theplurality of HLRTs serves as a routing hub.
 5. The FPGA defined in claim3 wherein the logic function HLRs is implemented using a look-up tablestructure programmed as a multiplexer.
 6. The FPGA defined in claim 1wherein HLRTs in the plurality of HLRTs include a connection block toprovide input multiplexing to a hybrid logic-or-routing function (HLR).7. The FPGA defined in claim 6 wherein the connection block providesinput multiplexing without providing output multiplexing to routingresources.
 8. The FPGA defined in claim 1 further comprising an externalport, and wherein at least one of the plurality of HLRTs is configuredas a logic function and multiple HLRTs are configured as routingfunctions, and the external port is directly connected to the HLRTconfigured as the logic function by transferring signals through directconnections between the multiple HLRTs.
 9. The FPGA defined in claim 1wherein the plurality of HLRTs forms an array of columns and rows. 10.The FPGA defined in claim 1 wherein the plurality of HLRTs is astand-alone die.
 11. The FPGA defined in claim 1 wherein the pluralityof HLRTs forms an array that is an embedded IP core in an integratedcircuit.
 12. The FPGA defined in claim 1 wherein the plurality of HLRTsforms an array that is part of a stacked die arrangement.
 13. A fieldprogrammable gate array (FPGA) comprising: an external port; a pluralityof hybrid logic or routing tiles (HLRTs) forming an array of rows andcolumns, each of the HLRTs being configurable as a logic function or arouting function, wherein a predefined set of HLRTs in the plurality ofHLRTs are neighboring HLRTs, and further wherein neighboring HLRTs aredirectly connected via direct-drive routing to connect HLRTs together;and further wherein at least one of the plurality of HLRTs is configuredas a logic function and one or more HLRTs are configured as routingfunctions, and the external port is directly connected to the HLRTconfigured as the logic function by transferring signals through directconnections between the multiple HLRTs.
 14. The FPGA defined in claim 13wherein the direct-drive routing connects HLRTs together without routingsegmentation.
 15. The FPGA defined in claim 13 wherein one or more ofthe plurality of HLRTs serves as a routing hub.
 16. The FPGA defined inclaim 15 wherein one logic function of at least one of the one or moreHLRTs is implemented using a look-up table structure programmed as amultiplexer.
 17. The FPGA defined in claim 13 wherein HLRTs in theplurality of HLRTs include a connection block to provide inputmultiplexing to an HLR without providing output multiplexing to routingresources.
 18. The FPGA defined in claim 13 wherein the plurality ofHLRTs is a stand-alone die.
 19. The FPGA defined in claim 13 wherein theplurality of HLRTs forms an array that is an embedded IP core in anintegrated circuit.
 20. The FPGA defined in claim 13 wherein theplurality of HLRTs forms an array that is part of a stacked diearrangement.